By Joel Levitt


In January of 2003 I had the wonderful opportunity to work in a gold mine in South Africa. Their mining was heavily mechanized with low profile loaders, heavy haul trucks, light gauge locomotives, and a car and truck fleet. The mine was deep (like 8000-10,000’). Hard rock mining like this is a tough, dangerous proposition. Maintaining the equipment is likewise tough and dangerous. Even in that tough environment the basic lessons are important. For example I asked them the easy question, “what is the mine’s product?” Of course they could answer “the Mine’s product is GOLD” (it was a gold mine after all).


Then I asked what was the product of the maintenance department? The universal answer was that the maintenance department’s product was a repair to broken equipment. Superficially that makes sense. When I think about the service department at a new truck dealer I think in terms of my truck is broken, they fix it. I pay for the repair. Therefore they are in the repair business.


Is the maintenance department of a mine any different from a service department in a truck dealer? I would say this point is the core difference between struggling maintenance departments and great ones. The answer of this query also explains the current focus of management toward cost cutting.


The maintenance department’s product is CAPACITY. It is the capacity to dig up the ore and turn it into GOLD. It is the capacity created by maintenance that is valuable, not the ability to repair equipment. In a fleet it is the capacity to move the freight from point A to point B.


What difference does this make? If capacity is the product then management should be focusing on optimizing capacity (the most capacity for the least resources). Since the capacity is so valuable, the maintenance resources might be a relatively small input into the calculation. On the other hand if truck repairs are the product then the focus is on cutting the cost of repairs by reducing parts inventory and number of people in the department.


Lets get back to mining. If nothing breaks we might able to mine enough ore to make 50,000# of gold a year. But due to breakdowns and downtime we actually only get 35,000# per year. The maintenance budget might be around $15,000,000 to achieve this level of production. Then the gap is 15,000# of gold a year. That might not sound like too much but a pound of gold is worth $5600, so the gap is worth $84,000,000 every year.


With proactive maintenance and other good maintenance practices we might be able to close 15% to 20% of the gap with modest (percentage wise) increases in the maintenance effort. Increases in the maintenance budget, which would be temporary, might amount to 5 to 10% or $1M to $2M per year for a few years. The extra investment might be in systems, increased inventory, additional training or some combination.


What does this have to do with a fleet in a modern country? The change of focus from repairs to capacity can guide you to smarter routing, better rigs, longer trailers and improved maintenance systems. If capacity is the name of the game then there is a lot of areas to look at other then always cutting costs.


It starts with a change in attitude toward maintenance. The product of Maintenance is capacity. There is way more money to be made annually for the company in increasing capacity then there is in a decade of maintenance budget cuts. The economics of good maintenance can make significant return on investment to companies willing to change their attitudes.

Executive Summary